Sequel to Election-nama!

My previous blog was about Election results concerning the path taken by Indian Democracy post-independence! 

https://panvalkarpramod.wordpress.com/2019/05/26/status-quo-election-nama/ 

But I could not write more things on the subject, as I limit my blogs to less than certain number of words. For want of a better title, I have given the title to this blog Sequel ….”! I had written about the Khan market gang, Tukde Tukde gang and others who were dead against the Modi regime. Somehow I was very uneasy with their extreme discomfort. Why were these people so uncomfortable? What is the difference between these people and others like you and me? 

I read a blog by Shobha De in Times of India dated 26/5/2019.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/politically-incorrect/how-liberals-living-in-la-la-land-misread-the-asli-hindustani/

She has accepted in the blog that she is from this group of people who thought Modi might just survive or lose the election. ( I feel that gang is too harsh a word). She felt that people like her have now become irrelevant. She has also said that she had hoped that all of them would wake up on 23rd May, the election day, with a big smile on their face. Shobha is one of the very few who have accepted what has happened. 

Some of the reactions from liberals on the election results were

  • Don’t underestimate ‘intelligence’ of voters! They had also voted Hitler, Mugabe, & Marcos to power! They have also voted Trump, Putin & Erdogan to power! 
  • It is a wave; it was always meant to be a wave. The hate wave has gripped India for a while. 
  • I clearly remember 16 May 2014. Everyone was rushing to JNU Students’ Union office to watch the Lok Sabha results. I had a naive belief that @ArvindKejriwal would become PM, that India would reject a mass murderer. That was the first time that I felt like a Muslim in India. 

I have nothing against the different views that people have. One of my closest friends is dead against Modi. I must have discussed election results with at least 50 people known to me. They are all professionals. They have been there and done that! Out of these 50, only one friend was against Modi. But he expected NDA to get 250 seats and he was not against everything by NDA. On the similar basis, I assume that comments above were from a specific group of people, who are in Media, who are in public eye, who had  enjoyed the government jaunts of foreign trips with Prime Ministers and other ministers in “olden days”. (Translated to preModi days). They have also been saying how much Modi is wasting money on foreign trips by taking a jumbo jet with very few advisors; he should travel in a smaller plane! (Translates into reporters don’t get free rides!)  

The 50 people I am talking of are very successful people in life, intelligent, smart and what have you. They were the CEO’s and owners and directors. Does it mean that all these liberals speaking diagonally opposite are better and more intelligent than my friends group? No way.  

Another thing I noticed was the discussion on the exit poll day. On a Marathi channel, there were many reporters as experts. The exit poll figure swung between 237 to 350 for NDA. All the “experts were unanimous in saying that figure would be much less than 237 and could go to as low as 137! It looked as if they wished it to happen. The reporters are supposed to be in touch with the ground realities; they are the knowalls! How can all of them be so wrong? When such vital predictions go wrong, does it affect their performance card? Are they demoted because of such blunder in the forecast? Are they forced to take a salary cut? Such project failures would, in any other job, could lead to people being terminated. I have not read any such news about reporters. 

Reporters, Liberal experts, along with the opposition politicians, have proved one thing during this election that they did not have the pulse of the masses. When they use the word masses, they mean to say, idiots. Other than these groups, no one else  knows what is happening in India.  

I am again quoting from Shobha’s blog because no one else has the guts to accept that they failed to predict the people’s verdict miserably.

The toughest thing people like me — like ‘us’ — have to face up to is our irrelevance. And do so, while keeping that stubborn chin up! Do we have what it takes to look within and find out what changed when we weren’t looking? When were we busy trying to convince ourselves, the past five years were nothing but an aberration? How wrong we were! Not just wrong in our assessment but wrong about virtually everything else! We were clinging on to our nostalgia — our over-romanticised idea of India — while refusing to accept the cold, hard reality that India had changed. It wasn’t even India anymore! It had become Hindustan!  

What by the way was an alternative to Modi? Naidu who could not retain his government? Banerjee whose workers created mayhem during the election campaign? Banerjee who refused to meet the prime minister (as per her- the “Outgoing PM.”) who wanted to discuss what help Central Government could give to cycloneravaged Bengal? Mayawati who asked a question, “If we can have Ram statues all over, what is wrong in having my statues too?Lalu Prasad who is languishing in jail with a 13year jail term. Rahul Gandhi who proved his merit by the Congress score of 0 in 17 states, including losing at Amethi.  This opposition governing us, was the “over-romanticised” idea of the experts!

I will share with you how people think, differently. A family friend, an excellent mathematician, has different views. She said, “It is the pharma and weapon lobby in the world who made sure that Modi, the hawk, won the elections. Modi will make sure that their products will be bought by India as Modi will definitely go to war with Pakistan.” I do not argue with such brilliant ideas.

All these wise, bright, sharp people were hoping to get the alternatives that are mentioned above. Had this group of politicians won the election to form a government in Delhi, where would they take India? Consider each persons expertise, and we can imagine that they would have been squabbling, fighting all the time with each other; each state trying to steal the projects irrespective of  whether they were useful for India. Yes, the foreign jaunts of the reporters in Jumbo jets would have started. Politicians and business people could have continued to try and loot the institutions and banks without fear.  

All the “experts” sit in their ivory towers in Delhi. Has anyone travelled to villages in Assam? Has anyone seen the bloodletting happening in Bengal? Following a few TRP story of Gau Rakshak killers make these people think that these incidents are controlled from Delhi. Yesterday when all channels were showing Modi’s speech, one channel showed breaking news Video of some horrible beatings in MP. I am all for Exposés! But we should not forget that bad things have been always happening in the world.  There is no extraordinary increase in these numbers during Modi’s time.

Social media and TV has its pluses and minuses. When a bad incident is telecast repeatedly for TRP we feel that the world is bad. Same is the case with WA and FB. But what people actually have in their minds will be known only by direct contact with them. So let us hope that the media, the opposition, the gang all learn their lessons and become responsible and thereby more effective.  I also hope that they stay away from their romanticism and live in the real world! Amen!

Advertisements

Celebrities and Intellectuals!

Since I am neither, I sometimes get confused and try to understand the difference between the two. Celebrity means a famous person, especially in entertainment or sports. It is also the state of being well known. Intellectual is a person possessing a highly developed intellect.

Does it mean that a celebrity is not an intellectual or intellectual is not a celebrity? This confusion becomes profound in India when elections are around. For reasons best known to them, different political parties pull in film stars for electioneering. They are used for giving speeches and pull the crowd. They talk about policies, state of the nation and on every subject under the Sun. I will never say that the intellectual ability of an individual depends only on education. But most of these stars cannot be called as highly educated. That they are at the top of their game in the chosen field does not mean that they can be “experts” in every other area. I am aware that they have speech writers but what different political parties achieve by pulling in celebrities, is not understood by me.

Why did the thoughts about celebrities and intellectuals come to my mind? A nationwide show of solidarity followed the terrorist attack at Pulwama, and a lot of people made different comments. Cricketer Harbhajan Singh twitted his comments within hours of the attack saying that India should not play Pakistan in world cup cricket matches. Some were talking of blood for blood and going to war. The reactions were at the two ends of the spectrum; from vicious to balanced. In this free world, everybody has a right to express views about happenings. I have seen that the reactions of intellectuals are usually balanced, measured and are made after due thought process. Sachin Tendulkar made his balanced comments after ¾ days. Instant responses to his remarks were “Is Tendulkar so busy that he has no time to give his comments?” There were twitter wars, and people started comparing the timings of Harbhajan and Sachin’s comments. Did it mean that if you comment on a subject within a stipulated period, you love your nation more? Does it say that delayed comments indicated that the person is less patriotic?

We have all seen that Harbhajan is a mercurial person whereas Sachin has always been a balanced person. Harbhajan’s reactions on the field have been recorded showing his way of thinking. In one of the IPL matches, Harbhajan slapped Sreesanth. In a test match against Australia, he had called an Australian player a monkey. (The episode later came to be known as Monkeygate) Harbhajan got away due to the stature of Sachin and smart lawyers, who found the loopholes. The main problem is that Sachin was made an MP and was awarded Bharat Ratna, the highest civilian award due to his sporting achievements. He is a celebrity and not an intellectual by any means. His views on sporting events are wise; he never makes controversial statements. As he has Bharat Ratna, people expect comments from him on all subjects. Do you expect Arun Jaitley or Raj Babbar to make comments on sports?

There is a big-ticket celebrity who is a secret intellectual. The person attracts comments from people because of his different nature. He is witty, has a great sense of humour! His name is Shah Rukh Khan. I have always felt that he is smart, and he is a good speaker too; his speeches in non-filmy settings are excellent. His statements are thought-provoking and sensible. Shah Rukh is one person who always invokes extreme reactions; people either love him or hate him!

Shah Rukh speech at Yale University

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0OaOnT8res

TED Talks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0NV1KdWRHck

If you like Shah Rukh then you will probably listen to his whole speech; the Yale speech is one hour long, and the Ted talk speech is 18 minutes long. But if you dislike him, still listen to him speak for at least ten minutes. It is worth it!

I have some clarity on who is a celebrity, but my doubts about who is intellectual are still not resolved. When we talk of highly developed intellect, I am still not sure because intellect means “the faculty of reasoning and understanding objectively, especially about abstract matters.” There are many abstract matters in different subjects like science, engineering, economics, psychology et al. Do we call an engineer an intellectual? Do we call a doctor a thinker? I have generally observed that those who write about philosophy or religion are called philosophers or intellectuals. Why is it so? Does it mean that only non-scientific reasoning should be called intellectual thinking?

I remember that about fifteen years back, I had an opportunity to listen to an intellectual speak. I was highly impressed. Three weeks later, he was to speak in another conference on a different topic. I readjusted my schedule and went back to listen to him. I was disappointed. His speeches were in the standard format. Speak for the first few minutes on the topic of the day, in the end, last five minutes summarise the speech. Why was I disappointed? His core speech in the middle was almost a copy/paste job of what he spoke three weeks before. In between, he linked that day’s topic with connecting sentences. He had nothing new to say. His one-hour speech was to me, a ten-minute speech.

I have heard Mr Rajeev Bajaj MD of Bajaj Auto Ltd speak and he is impressive. When he speaks for one hour, he speaks on that day’s subject for one hour! He is witty and reasonably good orator!

I have read about and know about many pseudo-intellectual. Pseudo-intellectuals are good marketing people and market themselves well with the right people or authorities. They are always in contact with newspaper guys; they wine and dine them. They get a good copy the next day. Somebody becomes a computer wizard; some other guys become great scientists; in a scientific circle, they are known as Sarkari (backed by the government) scientists!

Celebrities and intellectual have one significant difference. Stars are never psuedos. They are at the top of their chosen field of sports, cinema, music! Unless people accept them, they cannot reach the top.

Let us not troll the celebrities on the subject in which they are not at the top. Their place is different than intellectuals. Let both these people be busy and remain so in their fields. Don’t ask Sachin Tendulkar his opinion about new cancer drug, but ask him if Rishabh Pant is good enough number four batsman!

Freedom at Midnight from Aadhar!

Supreme Court gave a decision that “Right to Privacy is a Fundamental right of an individual”. This is a landmark decision and it is said that it will change many things in India. I am no political pundit nor am I a constitutional experts, I am a common man like most. This has directly affected LGBT community, who  are enthralled that their rights to choose sexual orientation can now be converted into a law! In another case, where there is a ban on beef business in various formats, a Supreme Court justice has said that what one should eat and if someone should drink alcohol are covered under fundamental rights. These cases will now get a different treatment. But in many discussions I have read that Right to Privacy can never be absolute and needs to be checked under proper legal infrastructure.

My take in this blog is going to be about Aadhar card! (Aadhaar is a 12 digit unique-identity number issued to all Indian residents based on their biometric and demographic data.) When Aadhar came into being under Nilekani, ex Infosys honcho, there were the usual Nay Sayers. In a conversation with Journalist Manu Joseph, Nilekeni divided the Aadhar Nay Sayers in four groups.

  • The Privacy gang
  • The rights of the poor gang
  • Oh My God 1984 has arrived gang
  • Luddites (meaning a person opposed to increased industrialization or new technology- this has old reference to British workers in textile industry having fear of losing their jobs due to technology in 19th century)

Privacy gang is those like you and I who are required to give their biometric details to the government and in return get nothing back. They don’t get any dole or any subsidy from Government. They are the most “affected” by what, god knows! This gang does not mind giving their biometrics for passport because it is an essential document for this group. Then when they go to cooler climes of Switzerland, “Oh! What do to do! For Schengen Visa you have to share biometrics!” For US visa, people will even shed all their clothes if forced! After all going to US of A is  life’s necessity! These countries are foreign governments so no harm in sharing the data with them but Indian Govt and Modi! Nah, I can’t share at the cost of loss of Privacy!” These foreign Governments have such fantastic data security, probably software written by Wipro’s and TCS’s of this world, that except Edward Snowden nobody has been able to steal the data from them! Trumpets & bugles please! Data security is definitely a concern but we have been giving data to banks, passport office, and various websites for sometime. What has Aadhar done that it makes people suddenly insecure about! Friends, I will share one example with you which might help you with the beauty of Aadhar number.  55 dealers from MP, Andhra and UP states returned their license to sell fertilizers which Government used to supply to them. Reason? They were supplied fertilizers at two rates, one with subsidy for those below poverty line and one normal rate. They would buy at low rates and sale at normal rates with huge profits. Government now made a rule that they should link the sale to Aadhar card and based on that the rate will be decided. How can Government come in our way of making huge profits? Return the license. I am sure Govt officials were also hand in glove in this chain!

Rights of the Poor gang was worried that if subsidy is linked to Aadhar, some may not get benefit as they may be too illiterate to enroll for Aadhar card. Ok, great! Courts gave a decision that if they don’t have Aadhar they should still get subsidy. So, as the Aadhar system improves more and more of these people will get Aadhar and still get subsidy. What is the problem with this gang? What this gang is worried if systems fall in place, their importance will reduce. Some of them had a gumption to tell Nilekeni that you have never lived in a village, what you know about villagers needs! (Gumption means shrewd or spirited initiative and resourcefulness)

 “Oh My God 1984 has arrived gang” is the trickiest ones. (Wikipedia describes, Nineteen Eighty-Four, often published as 1984, is a dystopian novel published in 1949 by English author George Orwell.[2][3] The novel is set in Airstrip One (formerly known as Great Britain), a province of the Super state Oceania in a world of perpetual war, omnipresent government surveillance, and public manipulation.) This group of people probably thinks Government will use Aadhar data to spy on people. Government does it anyway but Privacy judgment will make Government more law abiding! How Aadhar was making this easy I have never understood! These proponents of Orwell theory, I am sure, give their latest status on Facebook, every time they travel. “Sitting in Jet Airways Gold Lounge, travelling to Egypt” or some such thing! This is  my cell number please call after two hours!  Privacy what is that!

Anyway once the human race decided to come out of jungle and live as a society, basic definition of privacy changed forever! I am always wondering what is privacy in days of internet! When filling some form can we say,  I should be allowed not to mention if I am a male or a female or transvestite! What happens to reserved compartments on trains for women? What happens to reservation for women in education? I am a private person I will not give my address, I will not tell my birthdate? Where will this lead to? So there is bound to be limit to privacy. During filling up of any form some information has to be shared, similarly more information may be needed for Income Tax purpose. Don’t forget that there is black money and terrorist angle too! To overcome lacunae in PAN card, (which people are having more than one) Aadhar is a better alternative. More controls, are most welcome but do we need Goebbels! Social media like FB and WhatsApp has already created them!

WhatsApp Image 2017-08-26 at 15.22.06

Luddites is the group which is very uncomfortable with new technology. As they are uncomfortable, they don’t believe in new technology. If you don’t believe in something how can you trust it! For such groups honestly there is no solutions.

No technology or a system is 100% perfect. These improve over a period. After using the systems for some time, may be some better additional viewpoints will come up. Systems are bound to improve but again data hacking is always a possibility. So called hacking incident that has been in discussion currently was an event, an illegal act by a bank officer. It was not hacking. Aadhar already has big base and I am sure once people understand the importance of the same, more will come forward and enroll. There is a big trust deficit with large organizations. Jio is selling their SIM cards against Aadhar card. Many Nay Sayers must be wondering, will their privacy be breached? Similarly many social organizations have axe to grind against Bill & Melinda Gates foundation. This foundation has achieved things in a few years that social organizations could not achieve in decades!

Aadhar system is a modern technology, take advantage of the same instead of thrashing it, embrace it! Bina Aadhar mat raho! Aadhar means support, “Don’t live without support”!